Last night, Matthias Clasen and Shaun McCance helped me fix a gnome-doc-utils bug in gnome-system-monitor tarball. I then released gnome-system-monitor-2.17.93 because I am the maintainer.

Then, somebody, who owns a regular svn/ssh account, has commited without approval unreviewed content to gnome-system-monitor trunk. He also tagged the wrong way. And in the end, he released gnome-system-monitor-2.17.94. I don't know anything about this man. I've just got an email from him to tell what he has done. Update: he even created&closed a bug against system-monitor.

gnome-system-monitor 2.17.94 is not official and not trusted at all. DO NOT USE IT.

The following are unreviewed, not trusted and have unknown content :

  • SVN tag GNOME_SYSTEM_MONITOR_2_17_94 and revision 1935, 1936, 1937 and 1938
  • gnome-system-monitor 2.17.94 tarballs on the GNOME ftp server.

Today 28/02/2007, only the following are trusted and official :

  • SVN tag tags/GNOME_SYSTEM_MONITOR_2_17_93 and revisions up to 1934
  • gnome-system-monitor 2.17.93 tarballs on the GNOME ftp server.

Security infrastructure

It would be nice to be able to GPG-sign tarballs that are uploaded to the GNOME FTP server.