Harvard Business School of Echec - system-monitor - Commentaires

libsexy bugs - Christian Hammond

Christian Hammond — Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:48:02 +0100

I'm deferring that to David Trowbridge, who is responsible for that module. I think the plan though is to deprecate that widget. It wasn't really complete, and we haven't found a backtrace that's been very useful. If you happen to have one, though, we'd love to see it.

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - Benoît

Benoît — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:53:14 +0100

Quand tu ne sais pas pas du tout qui est la personne, quand tu n'as reçu aucun mail d'approbation ni rien, c'est un problème. Moi je me lève le matin, je vois qu'une release a été faite pendant que la nuit, je n'ai aucune info dessus, j'agite le drapeau rouge.

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - liberforce

liberforce — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:37:19 +0100

Tout cela vient d'une stupide confusion dan la précipitation pour essayer d'avoir un module ok pour la release... Je trouve que le ton indigné est franchement exagéré. Il y a eu boulette, certes, mais ce n'est pas comme si un pirate avait fait une release malveillante...

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - jk

jk — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:45:49 +0100

Wow on se croirait sur une mailing list debian... Franchement sans te connaître et en lisant ça tu fais un peu "control freak" paranoiaque

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - Me

Me — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:42:01 +0100

Get a life. You screwed up and someone fixed it. You should be thankful.

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - Yanko Kaneti

Yanko Kaneti — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:58:40 +0100

If it were me I'd rather _thank_ mariano and kmaraas for fixing stuff that was obviously problematic in the "official" release.

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - rangzen

rangzen — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:20:55 +0100

Autant sur le SVN, y a rien de particulier, autant dans le tarball ... Y en a pour une semaine à vérifier le m4 :/

gnome-system-monitor 2.17 has been compromised - andre

andre — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:02:51 +0100

and here's the explanation:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/rele...

"compromised" is a strong word. this isn't binary stuff that we're talking about, a diff shouldn't be that hard?